Determination
of Prochlorperazine Maleate
and Pyridoxine Hydrochloride in Combined Tablet Dosage form by using first
order derivative Spectrophotomeric method
G.
B. Bhagwat1,2*, P. T. Sonawane2
and V. V. Bopinwar2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Sharad
Pawar College of Pharmacy, Wanadongri,
Hingna Road, Nagpur 441 110 (M.S.), India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kasturi
Shikshan Sanstha’s College of
Pharmacy, Shikrapur, Pune
412 208 (M. S.), India
ABSTRACT:
A simple, accurate, economical and reproducible procedure for
simultaneous estimation of Prochlorperazine Maleate and Pyridoxine Hydrochloride in their tablet dosage
form is described. In this method 0.3M HCl was
utilized as solvent. In first order derivative spectroscopic method, two
wavelengths 252nm for prochlorperazine maleate (zero cross for pyridoxine hydrochloride) and
228.5nm for pyridoxine hydrochloride (zero cross for prochlorperazine
maleate) were selected. Both drugs obey
Beer-Lambert’s law in concentration range of 1-5 μg/ml
(prochlorperazine maleate)
and 5-25 μg/ml (pyridoxine hydrochloride)
respectively in 0.3M HCl. The suggested method is
validated by using ICH validation parameters like accuracy, precision,
specificity, ruggdness and linearity. The results of
recovery study were found to be within the prescribed limit of 98-102%. During
the linearity study it was observed that absorbance values of Prochlorperazine Maleate and
Pyridoxine Hydrochloride in marketed formulation were linear in the range of
80% to 120% of test concentration with R2 close to 1 for this method
of analysis.
KEYWORDS: Prochlorperazine Maleate,
Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, first order derivative spectroscopic method
INTRODUCTION:
Prochlorperazine maleate (PCM), 2-Chloro-10-[3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)propyl] 10 H phenothiazine
bis[hydrogen(Z)-butenedioate]
(fig. 1), is an antiemetic and antipsychotic drug [1] while pyridoxine
hydrochloride (PDH), 5-Hydroxy-6-methyl-3,4-pyridine dimethanol
hydrochloride (fig. 2), is a nutritional component [2]. Both the drugs are official in IP,
BP and USP. Literature survey revealed that HPLC [3, 4] methods have
been reported for pyridoxine hydrochloride with other drugs. However, no method
is reported for simultaneous estimation of these two drugs in combined dosage
form. This prompted us to develop simple, rapid, accurate, economical and
sensitive simultaneous estimation method for their determination in
combination.
Figure 1: Structure of prochlorperazine
maleate
Figure 2:
Structure of pyridoxine hydrochloride
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Instrumentation:
UV-Visible double beam spectrophotometer, model 1700 Pharmaspec with 1 cm quartz cells was used. Electronic
balance (Modal AUW-220D) was used for weighing.
Reagents and chemicals:
The chemicals used were of analytical grade. Commercially
available tablets of prochlorperazine maleate and pyridoxine hydrochloride in combination were
procured from local market. Standard prochlorperazine
maleate and pyridoxine hydrochloride were received as
gift sample from FDA Mumbai.
Selection of solvent:
A 0.3M HCl solution was selected as the
suitable solvent for the estimation of PCM and PDH.
Preparation of standard stock solution:
Standard stock solutions of PCM and PDH were prepared separately
by dissolving 25 mg each of standard PCM and PDH in 0.3M HCl
and making up the volume up to 100 ml (250 μg/ml).
Preparation of mixed standard solution:
An accurately weighed quantity of 5 mg PCM and 25 mg of PDH was
transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask. The drugs were dissolved in 50 ml of
0.3M HCl and finally Volume was made upto the mark with 0.3M HCl. This
solution was diluted further with 0.3M HCl to get the
concentration of five mixed standards as shown in table-1.
Table 1: Concentration of PCM and PDH in mixed standard
solution
|
Name of drugs |
Concentration in µg/ml |
|
Std. Std.2 Std.3 Std.4 Std.5 |
|
|
PCM |
01
02 03 04 05 |
|
PDH |
05 10 15 20
25 |
Selection of scanning range and sampling wavelength:
The standard solutions of PCM and PDH were diluted with 0.03 M HCl individually so as to get the concentration of 10µg/ml
for each drug and were scanned individually in the UV range 400-200 nm. The
spectral data thus obtained was then processed to obtain first derivative
spectrum at wavelength interval 0.1 nm. From the Spectrum of PCM showed zero
crossing point at 228.5 nm (fig.3) while PDH showed zero crossing at 252.0 nm
(fig.4). The two spectra were overlain is shown in fig. 5.
At the zero crossing point of PCM (228.5 nm), PDH showed a
measurable dA/dλ where
as zero crossing point of PDH (252.0 nm), PCM showed measurable dA/dλ. Hence the wavelengths
228.5 nm and 252.0 nm were selected as analytical wavelengths for determination
of PDH and PCM respectively
.
Figure 3: UV
Spectrum of PCM
Figure 4:
UV Spectrum of PDH
Figure 5:
Overlain first order derivative spectrum of PCM and PDH
Study of Beer-Lambert’s law at selected wavelength:
PCM obeyed Beer Lambert’s law in concentration range of 1-5 µg/ml
whereas PDH obeyed the law in concentration range of 5-25 µg/ml. The dA/dλ of each solution was
measured at 252.0 nm for PCM and 228.5 nm for PDH, respectively. The dA/dλ of each solution was
measured at 252.0 nm for PCM and 228.5 nm for PDH respectively.
Application of proposed method for the estimation of PCM
and PDH in tablet:
Marketed tablets Emidoxyn Forte (Shreya Life Science Pvt Ltd.,
Mumbai) were used for the simultaneous estimation of PCM and PDH. Twenty
tablets were accurately weighed. Average
weight of tablet was calculated. A quantity of tablet powder equivalent to 5 mg
of PCM and 25 mg of PDH was transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask and
dissolved in 0.3M HCl and volume was made to 100 ml.
The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper no.41.
The aliquot portion of filtrate was further diluted with 0.3M HCl to get final concentration 5 µg and 25 µg of PCM and
PDH, respectively. The absorbance of resulting solutions was measured at 252.0
nm and 228.5 nm in 1 cm cell against blank. The content of PCM and PDH in
tablet was calculated using the formula-
Where, As = Absorbance of sample,
Astd =
Absorbance of standard,
Wstd = Weight
of standard,
Ws = Weight of sample,
A = Average weight,
LC = Label claim
Method Validation:
Accuracy of an analytical method is the closeness of test results
obtained by that method to the true value. It was ascertained on the basis of
recovery studies performed by standard addition method. The preanalysed
tablet powder equivalent to about 5 mg PCM was taken in 100 ml volumetric
flask, to it standard solutions of PCM and PDH were
added in the different proportions. The mixture was shaken for 15 minutes and
volume was adjusted to the mark with 0.3M HCl and the
solutions were filtered through Whatman filter No.41. An aliquot portion of the
resultant solutions were appropriately diluted with 0.3M HCl
to get final concentration within the range of mixed standard.
Table 2:
Results for estimation of PCM and PDH in marketed formulation
|
Wt. of Sample (g) |
% of drug Estimation* |
SD |
RSD |
SE |
||||
|
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
|
|
0.1380 |
100.03 |
100.10 |
0.0438 |
0.1862 |
0.0019 |
0.0346 |
0.0015 |
0.0277 |
*Results are mean of five replicates. SD is standard
deviation of the mean, RSD is relative standard
deviation of the mean,
SE is the standard error of the mean.
Table 3:
Results and statistical data for recovery study
|
Sr. No. |
Amount of pure drug added (μg/ml) |
% Recovery* |
||
|
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
|
|
1 |
5 |
25 |
99.84 |
100.20 |
|
2 |
5 |
25 |
99.99 |
99.85 |
|
3 |
5 |
25 |
100.06 |
100.33 |
*Results are mean of five replicates.
Table 4:
Results of specificity studies
|
Sr. No |
Sample |
% Label
claim* |
|
|
PCM |
PDH |
||
|
1 2 3 4 |
Normal Alkali Acid oxide |
100.11 98.05 99.89 1 01.01 |
100.23 99.03 100.00 101.21 |
*Results are mean of five replicates.
Table - 5: Results of Ruggedness Study
|
Condition |
% label claim* |
SD |
RSD |
|||
|
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
PCM |
PDH |
|
|
Intraday |
100.01 |
100.43 |
0.0305 |
0.6658 |
0.0093 |
0.4433 |
|
Interday |
99.93 |
99.93 |
0.0989 |
0.0472 |
0.0009 |
0.0004 |
|
Different analyst |
99.86 |
99.96 |
0.0989 |
0.0742 |
0.0009 |
0.0004 |
*Results
are mean of five replicates.
Ruggedness was carried out by repeating the procedure under
different conditions
A. Days (Intraday and Interday)
B. Different analysts
Precision of analytical method is the degree of agreement among
individual results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple readings
of homogenous sample. It is expressed as the SD or RSD of series of
measurements. It was ascertained by replicate estimation of the drugs by
proposed method.
Specificity study was carried out by accurately weighed quantities
of tablet powder equivalent to 5 mg of PCM were taken in different 50 ml
volumetric flask and were stored for 24
hr under following conditions.
1. At room temperature (normal)
2. At 500C after addition
of 1.0 ml of 0.1N NaOH (alkali)
3. At 500C after addition
of 1.0 ml of 0.1N HCl (acid)
4. At 500C after addition
of 1.0 ml of 3% H2O2 (oxide)
The samples were diluted upto the mark
with 0.3M HCl and filtered through grade-1 filter
paper. Aliquot of the filtrate was diluted with 0.3M HCl
to get 10 µg/ml concentration of PCM.
Linearity study was carried out by accurately weighed
quantities of tablet powder equivalent to 80, 90, 100, 110 and 120 % of label claim were taken and dilutions were
done appropriately to obtain a concentration in the range of 80-120% of the
test concentration and absorbance were recorded at 252.0 nm and 228.5 nm. Both
PCM and PDH were found to be linear in 80-120% of the test concentration.
Figure 6:
Plot of Linearity and range study for PCM and PDH
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
An attempt has been made to develop a fast, sensitive, precise,
reproducible and economical analytical method for simultaneous estimation of
PCM and PDH in their combined dosage form. In this method drugs obey Beer’s law
in the concentration range 1-5 μg/ml for PCM and
5-25 μg/ml for PDH, respectively.
The result of % estimation of drugs is shown in Table-2. The
method was validated as per the ICH and USP guidelines [5, 6, 7]. The results of recovery study were found to be within
the prescribed limit of 98-102%, proving the accuracy and showing that the
method is free from interference from excipients. For
precision, replicate estimations of both PCM and PDH in the same batch of
tablet were done by the proposed method, which yielded quite concurrent
results, indicating reliability of the method. The values of SD or RSD are
within the prescribed limit of 2%, showing high precision of method.
In the specificity study, sample was exposed to different stress
condition like acid, alkali, peroxide and heat. For ruggedness, proposed method
was repeated under different conditions like at different time, on different
days and by different analysts, prove that the method is reproducible. During
the linearity study it was observed that absorbance values of PCM and PDH in
marketed formulation were linear in the range of 80% to 120% of test
concentration with R 2 close to 1 for this method of analysis.
From the study of validation parameters namely accuracy, precision
(SD and RSD), ruggedness (interday, intraday and different analyst),
specificity, linearity and range, it was observed that the method is specific,
accurate, precise, reproducible and rugged.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed method for simultaneous estimation of PCM and PDH in
their combined dosage form is quite accurate, precise, reproducible and rugged.
Moreover, the method is economical, simple and rapid. Hence, the method can be
employed for routine quantitative analysis of tablet dosage form containing PCM
and PDH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors wish to thank Principal Dr. K. P. Bhusari, Sharad Pawar College of Pharmacy, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University for providing necessary
facilities. They also thank Mr. Kamlesh Shende, FDA Department, Mumbai for
providing the authentic sample of drugs.
REFERENCES:
[1] Budavari S., The
Merck index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals.
13th ed. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Research Lab, Division of
Merck; 2001.7850.
[2] Budavari S., The
Merck index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals.
13th ed. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Research Lab, Division of
Merck; 2001.8072.
[3] Poongothai S, Ilavarasan R and Karrunakaran C.
M. Simultaneous and accurate determination of vitamins B1, B6,
B12, and alpha-lipolic acid in
multivitamin capsule by Reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatographic
method. Int J Pharm Pharm 2(4);2010:133-139.
[4] Khor Swan-Choo and Tee E-Siong (1996).
Development of a HPLC method for simultaneous determination of several B-vitamine and ascorbic acid. Mal J Nutr
2:49-65.
[5] ICH Q2B; Guidelines on validation of analytical procedure;
Definitions and terminology, Federal Register, 1995, 60, 11260.
[6] ICH Q2B; Guidelines on validation of analytical procedure; Methodololgy, Federal
Register, 1996, 60, 27464.
[7] The United States Pharmacopoeia 24/ National Formulary 19, The United States Pharmacopoeial
Convection, Rockville, 2000, 2151.
Received on 01.11.2012
Modified on 24.11.2012
Accepted
on 04.12.2012
©
A&V Publication all right reserved
Research J. Science and Tech.
4(6): November –December, 2012: 262-266